Manderby's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[Sweet Touch ♥]

Ok, the Twitter reference was obvious... But I can't seem to find other ones? What does the moon stand for?

Ah, that hot ass.

Oh. Sorry, did I wrote that oud loud?

ChutneyGlaze responds:

the bird isn't a twitter reference you funny bean!

[Go To Bread]

Looking at your animations delivered in the past, it's not bad entertainment, I find it quite decent. Though, to be honest, aside from that, it is slowly starting to feel same-as-always. The crude animation style was good for starters but I might want to see something more elaborate from you. The main character often being an indistinct teen, occasional hip culture references and repetitive weird faces just do not bring more than an small smirk on my face.
I think you could advance by going more focused in the story-telling and why not experimenting with a bit more animation than just mouth and eyes.

[Little Runmo]

Welcome gooseworx and thanks for this superb animation! Would never have discovered you if you did not put this here on Newgrounds. :)

[Just Beyond the Golden Arches]

SickAnimation and MeatCanyon team up. Oh boy! That is as epic as when SexualLobster and TheWeebl did this:
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/570552

[Sonic gets cucked]

Yeah. You do like them. You do. ;)

[Ollie & Scoops Episode 6: Old Crumplecranks]

The quality of this is outstanding! The references, the visual setup, the voices, lyrics, song, ... all of it. I am somewhat speechless. How dare you to please us all with this!

[Sleep Tight]

Exquisit voice acting!

[Camelittle]

I just came a lot.

[Are NG's Users Being Lied To?]

It's a natural thought to come up with when seeing strange numbers like the ones you describe. In my experience though, this is because the randomness observable in the Internet often times does not really "feel" random to humans, which is why people do not believe in coincidence if they see two, three outliers in sequence. Generally with time, rating systems converge to produce an almost unbreakable, stable outcome. It might very well just be noise. Therefore, primarily, I doubt that something manipulatively odd is going on. But with changing requirements, such processes also change (or must be changed) and maybe an error is introduced. So one has to check.

That being said, I'm sure, monitoring the numbers externally doesn't serve anything except spawning conspiracy. Why not just ask liljim to write an SQL statement for you? Probably he isn't allowed to share the raw data but at least they can answer the question without noise.

[Rubber Hose Feud (toon history drama)]

Wow, that must have been a lot of work! But I miss Skitzo the Bear!